prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Facilitating rapid dissemination of knowledge : towards the development of a rapid review reporting guideline
  Download
PDF 3.66 MB
doctoral thesis
Facilitating rapid dissemination of knowledge : towards the development of a rapid review reporting guideline
2019. urn:nbn:hr:171:693909
Stevens, Adrienne
University of Split
School of Medicine

Cite this document

Stevens, A. (2019). Facilitating rapid dissemination of knowledge : towards the development of a rapid review reporting guideline (Doctoral thesis). Split: University of Split, School of Medicine. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:693909

Stevens, Adrienne. "Facilitating rapid dissemination of knowledge : towards the development of a rapid review reporting guideline." Doctoral thesis, University of Split, School of Medicine, 2019. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:693909

Stevens, Adrienne. "Facilitating rapid dissemination of knowledge : towards the development of a rapid review reporting guideline." Doctoral thesis, University of Split, School of Medicine, 2019. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:693909

Stevens, A. (2019). 'Facilitating rapid dissemination of knowledge : towards the development of a rapid review reporting guideline', Doctoral thesis, University of Split, School of Medicine, accessed 19 November 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:693909

Stevens A. Facilitating rapid dissemination of knowledge : towards the development of a rapid review reporting guideline [Doctoral thesis]. Split: University of Split, School of Medicine; 2019 [cited 2024 November 19] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:693909

A. Stevens, "Facilitating rapid dissemination of knowledge : towards the development of a rapid review reporting guideline", Doctoral thesis, University of Split, School of Medicine, Split, 2019. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:693909

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleFacilitating rapid dissemination of knowledge : towards the development of a rapid review reporting guideline
Title (croatian)Poticanje brze diseminacije znanja : razvoj smjernica za izvještavanje o brzim preglednim člancima
AuthorAdrienne Stevens https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6257-4806
MentorDavid Moher https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2434-4206 (mentor)
Committee memberIvana Kolčić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberLivia Puljak (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberTomislav Smoljanović (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Split
School of Medicine
Split
Defense date and country2019, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Universal decimal classification
(UDC)		616 - Pathology. Clinical medicine
Abstract
Rapid reviews have emerged to collate evidence for decision-making circumstances that need timely access. While information about rapid reviews such as their uses and characteristics have been published, they are known to be poorly reported. Numerous reporting guidelines have been developed in the health care literature as problem-solving endeavours in relation to reporting. The efforts of this dissertation have been undertaken to help and serve the research community to understand the state-of-science in relation to the reporting of rapid reviews. We have found that no reporting guidelines exist for rapid reviews. PRISMA serves as a good starting place to facilitate the reporting of rapid reviews but, through experience, we have found that PRISMA could be expanded to address unique aspects of rapid review conduct. We undertook an empirical study and, consistent with previously published work, found that rapid reviews are poorly reported, perhaps even more than previously shown. If rapid reviews are to fulfill the purpose for which they are intended – to inform important healthcare and health systems decision-making – then reporting must improve. To leave otherwise would be unethical. A reporting guideline needs to be developed to help rapid reviewers. Such work is underway and will be disseminated widely. Of importance is to determine how best to implement the guideline to ensure it serves its purpose, and little evidence, aside from the CONSORT guideline, exists to this regard. Encouraging journals to consider strong actions of endorsement, such as intentional integration during editorial review, will be an important message. However, for the majority of rapid reviews that are conducted outside of a journalpublication environment, outreach will need to take place to explore what implementation looks like and to identify and address any potential barriers.
Abstract (croatian)
Brzi pregledni članci (engl. rapid reviews) novi su oblik sažimanja dokaza za odlučivanje u situacijama kad je potrebno brzo donošenje medicinskih odluka. Iako su do sada objavljivana istraživanja o brzim preglednim člancima, primjerice o načinu kako se koriste i o njihovim obilježjima, poznato je da je izvještavanje u takvim istraživanjima loše. U biomedicinskoj literaturi su razvijene brojne smjernice za izvještavanje kako bi se riješio problem lošeg izvještavanja u literaturi. Cilj ove doktorske disertacije bio je pomoći istraživačkoj zajednici u razumijevanju načina izvještavanja u brzim preglednim člancima. Utvrdili smo da ne postoje smjernice za izvještavanje brzih preglednih članaka. PRISMA smjernice su pogodne kao početna točka za poticanje boljeg izvještavanja u brzim preglednim člancima, ali smo također utvrdili da bi PRISMA smjernice trebalo prilagoditi i proširiti kako bi se zadovoljili jedinstveni pristupi koji se koriste u provedbi brzih preglednih članaka. Empirijskim istraživanjem, i dosljedno rezultatima ranije objavljenih znanstvenih radova, utvrdili smo da je izvještavanje u brzim preglednim člancima loše, čak možda i više nego što je ranije pokazano. Kako bi brzi pregledni članci zadovoljili svoju primarnu svrhu – a to je donošenje važnih informacija za donošenje odluka u medicini i zdravstvu – njihovo izvještavanje se mora popraviti. Nužno je osmisliti smjernice za izvještavanje brzih preglednih članaka. Takve smjernice trenutno su u izradi. Vrlo je važno utvrditi kako na najbolji način primijeniti smjernice kako bi bile svrhovite, a za što osim CONSORT smjernica postoji vrlo malo dokaza. Urednike treba poticati na promoviranje smjernica za izvještavanje, primjerice kroz integraciju tih smjernica u urednički proces. Međutim, budući se većina brzih preglednih članaka obavlja izvan znanstvenih časopisa, nužno je podignuti svijest o važnosti dobrog izvještavanja takvih radova među organizacijama i autorima koji ih provode. Također će u budućnosti biti važno istražiti kako izgleda implementacija smjernica te kako se mogu prepoznati i riješiti potencijalne prepreke.
Keywords
Keywords (croatian)
Languageenglish
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:171:693909
Study programmeTitle: Translational Research in Biomedicine - TRIBE
Study programme type: university
Study level: postgraduate
Academic / professional title: doktor/doktorica znanosti, interdisciplinarna područja znanosti (doktor/doktorica znanosti, interdisciplinarna područja znanosti)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2023-05-12 08:24:37