prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations : a scoping review
  Download
PDF 250.41 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations : a scoping review
Science and Engineering Ethics, 27 (2021), 1; 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1
Ščepanović, Rea; Labib, Krishma; Buljan, Ivan; Tijdink, Joeri; Marušić, Ana

Cite this document

Ščepanović, R., Labib, K., Buljan, I., Tijdink, J. & Marušić, A. (2021). Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations : a scoping review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27. (1). doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1

Ščepanović, Rea, et al. "Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations : a scoping review." Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 27, no. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1

Ščepanović, Rea, Krishma Labib, Ivan Buljan, Joeri Tijdink and Ana Marušić. "Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations : a scoping review." Science and Engineering Ethics 27, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1

Ščepanović, R., et al. (2021) 'Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations : a scoping review', Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(1). doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1

Ščepanović R, Labib K, Buljan I, Tijdink J, Marušić A. Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations : a scoping review. Science and Engineering Ethics [Internet]. 2021 January 27 [cited 2024 November 11];27(1). doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1

R. Ščepanović, K. Labib, I. Buljan, J. Tijdink and A. Marušić, "Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations : a scoping review", Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 27, no. 1, January 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:171:547708. [Accessed: 11 November 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Practices for research integrity promotion in research performing organisations and research funding organisations : a scoping review
AuthorRea Ščepanović
AuthorKrishma Labib
AuthorIvan Buljan
AuthorJoeri Tijdink
AuthorAna Marušić
Author's institutionUniversity of Split
School of Medicine
(Research in biomedicine and health)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Public Health and Health Care
Public Health
Abstract (english)
Research integrity (RI) is a continuously developing concept, and increasing emphasis is put on creating RI promotion practices. This study aimed to map the existing RI guidance documents at research performing organisations (RPOs) and research funding organisations (RFOs). A search of bibliographic databases and grey literature sources was performed, and retrieved documents were screened for eligibility. The search of bibliographical databases and reference lists of selected articles identified a total of 92 documents while the search of grey literature sources identified 118 documents for analysis. The retrieved documents were analysed based on their geographical origin, research field and organisational origin (RPO or RFO) of RI practices, types of guidance presented in them, and target groups to which RI practices are directed. Most of the identified practices were developed for research in general, and are applicable to all research fields (n=117) and medical sciences (n=78). They were mostly written in the form of guidelines (n=136) and targeted researchers (n=167). A comprehensive search of the existing RI promotion practices showed that initiatives mostly come from RPOs while only a few RI practices originate from RFOs. This study showed that more RI guidance documents are needed for natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities since only a small number of documents was developed specifically for these research fields. The explored documents and the gaps in knowledge identified in this study can be used for further development of RI promotion practices in RPOs and RFOs.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review - international
Publication versionAccepted version
Journal titleScience and Engineering Ethics
Numberingvol. 27, no. 1, 4
p-ISSN1353-3452
e-ISSN1471-5546
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:171:547708
Online first2021-01-27
Accepted2020-11-08
ProjectNumber: 824481
Title (english): Standard Operating Procedures for Research Integrity
Acronym: SOPs4RI
Jurisdiction: eu
Funding stream: HORIZON 2020
Document URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2021-04-06 12:14:30