Objectives: The aim was to assess the attitudes of medical, dental and pharmacy students at the University of Split School of Medicine toward the use of blended learning; to compare the attitudes of the students in different study programs and in different academic years. Materials and methods: In this study, a transversal survey was conducted using the questionnaire. The questionnaire was fully anonymous, created in Google Docs program, and sent to all student representatives from the April to June 2020. The total number of the students who participated was 250. Inthe questionnaire students were asked for general information and in second part they answered about their attitutes about blended learning. Descriptive sample analysis was performed, and the results are presented in the percentage. Results: The study involved 250 students, out of a total of 908 enrolled (27.5%). Three-quarters of students had no problem accessing the online learning materials. In all the studies at our faculty, students in large number agreed with this statement. Over two-thirds of respondents believe that network platforms are easy to use. However, over 80% of pharmacy students and two-thirds of all respondents find that online materials require more time to be understood. Almost 60% of dental students believe that professors encouraged discussion among students, and as many as 47% of all surveyed students do not agree with this statement. Slightly more than a third of the students in our survey and as many as 42.2% of medical students believe that the help from their professors was insufficient. First and sixth year students expressed their greatest satisfaction with the engagement of their professors. Nearly 40% of students believe that blended learning deepend their interest in the subjects, at least a quarter of pharmacy students. However, the percentage of students who agree with this statement increases significantly from the first to the final years. Almost 70% of sixth-year students agreed with the statement. Seventeen percent of students consider that blended learning is waste of time; mostly, one-fifth, of first and fourth year students and only 3% of sixth year students. Conclusion: More than half of students believe that blended learning would be most effective for most preclinical subjects if the share of e-learning was 30% or more. Although it is thought that blended learning is a useful way of learning, students consider that learning through Moodle platform cannot fully replace traditional way of teaching.